Talk:Newtonian Human Geography

From Geography

Revision as of 06:13, 24 October 2012

1. Relevance: It is relevant for this course. Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: … 2. Well-written: a) well-written: its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard; the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: … b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context. Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: … 3. well-researched: Factually accurate and verifiable: a) it provides references to all sources of information following the APA guidelines; Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: … b) it provides in-line citations (including page numbers) from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the APA guidelines. Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: … 4. Broad in its coverage: a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: … b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: … 5. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each. Rating: …… (0-10) Comments: …

6. Stable: 8. The text is quite stable, although this is an new approach. This means that the basics could change a little to make it more applicable.

7. Well-structured: a) a lead: 7. This text consists a good lead which explains what kind of approach this Newtonian Human Geography is.

b) appropriate structure: 7. This text is written with an hierarchical structure, altough it doesn't consist headlines. It's still clear.

c) categories: This text doesn't contain any categories, although these are missing; spatial science, human action, behaviour and location.

8. Illustrated: This text doesn't contain any pictures.

9. Length: 8. The text is not too long and not too short.

Page published by Renate van Haaren, --RenateVanHaaren 08:13, 24 October 2012 (CEST)