Talk:Newtonian Human Geography

From Geography

1. Relevance: 7. This topic is relevant, because it's a new approach of spatial science.

2. Well-written: a) 8. This text is professional written, without any spelling errors. The grammar is quite good as well.

b) 8. This text consists all important details.

3. well-researched: a) 8. The references follow the APA structure.

b) It doesn't contain any citations.

4. Broad in its coverage: a) 7. It adresses the main details, but maybe it would be good if there would be an example given. This to clearify the subject.

b) 7. It does stay focued to the main subject and it's good that the critisism is written in this text as well.

5. Neutral: 8. This text is neutrally written and won't chance from day to day. It can change though because it's a new concept and it has to fit better maybe.

6. Stable: 8. The text is quite stable, although this is an new approach. This means that the basics could change a little to make it more applicable.

7. Well-structured: a) a lead: 7. This text consists a good lead which explains what kind of approach this Newtonian Human Geography is.

b) appropriate structure: 7. This text is written with an hierarchical structure, altough it doesn't consist headlines. It's still clear.

c) categories: This text doesn't contain any categories, although these are missing; spatial science, human action, behaviour and location.

8. Illustrated: This text doesn't contain any pictures.

9. Length: 8. The text is not too long and not too short.

Page published by Renate van Haaren, --RenateVanHaaren 08:13, 24 October 2012 (CEST)