Second order space

From Geography

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (6 revisions)
 
(8 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
Wolfgang Zierhofer made a distinction in space. He seperated space in first-order space and second- order space. According to Zierhofer: “The benefit of this distinction between first and second order spaces is to combine a notion of space as fundamental epistemic category, on the one hand, with the infinite empirical richness of particular object-spaces and locational schemes, on the other hand” (2005, p. 32).  
+
[[Wolfgang Zierhofer]] made a distinction in space. He seperated space into [[first order space]] and second order space. According to Zierhofer: “The benefit of this distinction between first and second order spaces is to combine a notion of space as fundamental epistemic category, on the one hand, with the infinite empirical richness of particular object-spaces and locational schemes, on the other hand” (2005, p. 32).  
-
To make a clear explenation about what second-order space is, there has to be clarified wat first-order space contains. The first order- space is the most abstract and general form of space. Here has to be made a distinction in space. By these distinctions, codes are created, for example we need a set of names in order to classify things. With this classification we are able to tell stories.  For further explenation of this concept, see the wiki about this subject (Zierhofer, 2002). 
+
== Order spaces ==
-
When the codes are combined with distinctions with a specific meaning, there is a switch from first-order space to second-order space. This can be one or several second-order spaces. Times represent a class of second-order space. This is because times, regarded as temporal codes, are distinctions with a specific meaning (Zierhofer, 2002).  
+
To make a clear explanation about what second order space is, there has to be clarified what first order space contains. The [[first order space]] is 'the most abstract and general form' of space. The first order space is purely formal and consist in two different locations. This space offers nothing but possibility of distinction (Ziefhofer, 2005). The second order space carry a more 'specific meaning' which is more resolute than the first order spaces. As an example is adding a temporal dimension to spaces: "time" (Zierhofer, 2002, p. 1369).  
 +
By these distinctions in spaces, codes are created, for example we need a set of names in order to classify things. With this classification we are able to tell stories. For further explanation of this concept, see the wiki about this subject (Zierhofer, 2002). 
-
----
+
When the codes are combined with distinctions with a specific meaning, there is a switch from first order space to second order space. This can be one or several second order spaces. Times represent a class of second order space. This is because time, regarded as temporal codes, are distinctions with a specific meaning (Zierhofer, 2002).
-
'''References:'''
+
In the second order space the social and the spatial coalesce. Because one hand spaces are structuring the interactions and therefore structuring society. And on the other hand these interactions in society will lead to a way of structuring space (Zierhofer, 2005). 
-
Zierhofer, W. (2005). State, power and space. Social Geography,1,29-36.
+
== References: ==
-
Zierhofer, W. (2002). Speech acts and space(s): Language pragmatics and the discursive constitution of the social. Environment and Planning,34,1355-1372.  
+
Zierhofer, W. (2005). State, power and space. ''Social Geography, 1'', 29-36.  
 +
Zierhofer, W. (2002). Speech acts and space(s): Language pragmatics and the discursive constitution of the social. ''Environment and Planning, 34'', 1355-1372.
 +
 +
== Contributors ==
Published by Lotte Brouwer & Inge Schoenmakers
Published by Lotte Brouwer & Inge Schoenmakers
 +
 +
''Links added by Aafke Brus'' --[[User:AafkeBrus|AafkeBrus]] 10:43, 1 November 2011 (CET)
 +
 +
Edited by Lotte den Boogert, 7 oktober 2012
 +
 +
Edited by [[User:HuubVanDerZwaluw|HuubVanDerZwaluw]] 18:37, 21 October 2012 (CEST)
 +
 +
[[Category: Language Pragmatic Action Theory]]

Latest revision as of 16:37, 21 October 2012

Wolfgang Zierhofer made a distinction in space. He seperated space into first order space and second order space. According to Zierhofer: “The benefit of this distinction between first and second order spaces is to combine a notion of space as fundamental epistemic category, on the one hand, with the infinite empirical richness of particular object-spaces and locational schemes, on the other hand” (2005, p. 32).

Order spaces

To make a clear explanation about what second order space is, there has to be clarified what first order space contains. The first order space is 'the most abstract and general form' of space. The first order space is purely formal and consist in two different locations. This space offers nothing but possibility of distinction (Ziefhofer, 2005). The second order space carry a more 'specific meaning' which is more resolute than the first order spaces. As an example is adding a temporal dimension to spaces: "time" (Zierhofer, 2002, p. 1369).

By these distinctions in spaces, codes are created, for example we need a set of names in order to classify things. With this classification we are able to tell stories. For further explanation of this concept, see the wiki about this subject (Zierhofer, 2002).

When the codes are combined with distinctions with a specific meaning, there is a switch from first order space to second order space. This can be one or several second order spaces. Times represent a class of second order space. This is because time, regarded as temporal codes, are distinctions with a specific meaning (Zierhofer, 2002).

In the second order space the social and the spatial coalesce. Because one hand spaces are structuring the interactions and therefore structuring society. And on the other hand these interactions in society will lead to a way of structuring space (Zierhofer, 2005).

References:

Zierhofer, W. (2005). State, power and space. Social Geography, 1, 29-36.

Zierhofer, W. (2002). Speech acts and space(s): Language pragmatics and the discursive constitution of the social. Environment and Planning, 34, 1355-1372.

Contributors

Published by Lotte Brouwer & Inge Schoenmakers

Links added by Aafke Brus --AafkeBrus 10:43, 1 November 2011 (CET)

Edited by Lotte den Boogert, 7 oktober 2012

Edited by HuubVanDerZwaluw 18:37, 21 October 2012 (CEST)